Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to afrokk.dev

Afrokk - Software Engineer · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
83match
angelgrimaldo.dev
Angel Grimaldo - Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
83match
adamgrady.dev
Adam Grady | Senior Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
83match
faridraka.dev
Farid Raka | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
83match
arthursena.com
sena | software engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
82match
fcoterroba.com
fcoterroba - software engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
82match
ahmad-mahmood.dev
Ahmad Mahmood - Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
82match
sokuranton.dev
Anton Sokur - Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
82match
andriyn.tech
Andri Yani - Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
81match
abdelmaksoud.dev
Mohamed Abdelmaksoud - Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
81match
kushbhalodi.com
Kush Bhalodi | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
81match
fauki.com
Fauki Rijatul H - Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
81match
gtsif.com
George Tsiftsis - Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
81match
matiasrotondo.com
John Doe | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
81match
abdulhameed.dev
Abdul Hameed - Software Engineer Portfolio
1 shared topicsweb-development
81match
aryankulkarni.com
Aryan Kulkarni - Software Engineer & Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
81match
alfredjmg.dev
Alfredo Mujica Godoy - Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
81match
farishm.com
Muhammad Faris - Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
81match
rjcodes.dev
Lee Ren Jie | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.