Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to afrl.me

afrl.me - freelance game dev · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
72match
guanomancer.com
Freelance game developer & code wizard
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
69match
roadtogame.dev
Home - Road to Game Dev
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
69match
theneco.dev
Lewis Vaughan | Freelance Developer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
68match
cmgforge.com
CMG Forge | Free Game Dev Tools
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
68match
irresponsiblegamedev.com
Irresponsible Game Dev
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
68match
robbworks.dev
RobbWorks | Indie Game & Freelance Web Developer in Florida
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
68match
softmelongames.com
Avada Freelancer – Where Gamers chill!
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
68match
societemgd.com
Montréal Game Dev
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
68match
thenakedgamedev.com
The Naked Game Dev
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
67match
fearlessgamedev.com
FEAR//LESS GAME DEV
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
67match
robertadamsiii.com
Rob Adams, Game Dev
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
67match
solodory.com
MossGame | Free Game Dev Tools Directory
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
67match
arrowplaygamedesign.com
Home - Arrowplay Game Design
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
67match
instgame.com
InstGame - Free Online Games | Game Distribution Platform
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
67match
kyegames.com
KyeGames - Free Online Games
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
67match
krystalloh.com
Krystal Loh – freelance editor
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
67match
1stingames.com
Best Game Deals
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
67match
solideo.com
Home - Solideo - Video Game Developer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.