Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to afranjournal.org

African Journal of Nephrology · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
73match
asn-online.org
American Society of Nephrology
1 shared topicsmedical-health
72match
asean-journal-radiology.org
The ASEAN Journal of Radiology
1 shared topicsmedical-health
72match
newjournalurology.com
The New Journal of Urology
1 shared topicsmedical-health
70match
rn-journal.com
Journal of Nursing | RN Journal
1 shared topicsmedical-health
68match
mathepidemi.com
Journal of Mathematical Epidemiology
1 shared topicsmedical-health
68match
socialkidney.com
Nephrology Tweetbook
1 shared topicsmedical-health
68match
asdin.org
American Society of Diagnostic and Interventional Nephrology
1 shared topicsmedical-health
68match
rjmsonline.com
Research Journal of Medical Science
1 shared topicsmedical-health
67match
bmjjournal.com
BMJ Journal
1 shared topicsmedical-health
67match
annanurse.org
Home - ANNA | American Nephrology Nurses Association
1 shared topicsmedical-health
67match
cliniques-ster.com
ClinSter Journal -
1 shared topicsmedical-health
67match
intjmi.com
Journal of Emergency Health Care
1 shared topicsmedical-health
67match
asnr.org
American Society of Neuroradiology
1 shared topicsmedical-health
67match
doctorvarun.com
Dr Varun Verma - MD, DNB Nephrology
1 shared topicsmedical-health
67match
internationaljhd.com
International Journal of Health Disciplines
1 shared topicsmedical-health
66match
abu.org
The American Board of Urology |
1 shared topicsmedical-health
66match
clinicaladvancedmedicine.com
Journal of Clinical and Advanced Medicine
1 shared topicsmedical-health
66match
acrvoiceofradiology.org
American College of Radiology
1 shared topicsmedical-health

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.