Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to afqx.net

ArcticFqx (Dan-Eric Næss) · GitHub · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
68match
benedikt-lohse.dev
LinuxTux23 (bl) · GitHub
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
themoosman.com
themoosman (Karl Moos) · GitHub
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
andrewlmartin.dev
AndrewR3K (Andrew) · GitHub
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
arjen.dev
arjenbos (Arjen Bos) · GitHub
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
l-oj.com
larry-oj · GitHub
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
mattchard.com
mchar7 (Matt) · GitHub
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
nflverse.com
nflverse · GitHub
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
argymeg.com
argymeg (Argy Megalios) · GitHub
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
invition.dev
iNViTiON (MiX) · GitHub
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
robertsenseman.com
rsenseman (Rob) · GitHub
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
therealdev.com
Josh-XT (Josh XT) · GitHub
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
pimhakkert.com
pimhakkert (Pim Hakkert) · GitHub
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
bindernews.net
Bindernews (Binder News) · GitHub
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
dita-users.com
DITA Users · GitHub
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
thepotato.dev
ThePotatoGuy · GitHub
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
berankovi.net
Kobzol (Jakub Beránek) · GitHub
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
1nikolas.dev
1nikolas (Nikolas Spiridakis) · GitHub
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
mattjberry.com
mberry-hub (Matt Berry) · GitHub
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.