Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to afor.digital

Afor Linktree · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
75match
andrewdurnford.com
Andrew Durnford
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
75match
felipeafonso.com
Felipe Afonso's Portfolio
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
75match
matthewmacraebovell.com
Matthew MacRae-Bovell
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
75match
phuopham.com
Welcome to Astro.
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
72match
guardports.com
TrustyMug.com - Software Development for the Modern World
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
71match
a13n.com
Andrew Rasmussen
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
71match
roiwe.com
Title page
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
71match
increase.co.uk 🇬🇧
Increase Computers Home | Increase Computers
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
kruthers.com
Home - kruthers.com
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
kurtpeters.com
Kurt Peters | Linktree
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
alephbbs.com
The Wirehead Mechanist | creatives and technology
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
insitequery.com
Home - Simple
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
rootquiz.com
Root Quiz
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
softwareprofy.com
Home - SoftwareProfy
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
thepeacetech.com
Peace Tech - Home
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
cloudauto.io
Awesomely - Your SaaS Title
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
newuser.dev
Nishant's digital garden
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
animeneko.net
AnimeNeko Network
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.