Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to aelpxy.dev

aelpxy · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
64match
maxburson.com
Max Burson
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
anicholson.net
build software, build people | andrewdotnich
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
armannvg.com
armannvg
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
aaronackerman.com
🍐 Pear Programming
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
1saeed.dev
Saeed Salehi
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
dolevoper.io
Dolevoper
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
roblouie.com
roblouie | Thoughts, ideas, and tutorials on software development. Mostly JavaScript.
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
abi.io
abi@io:~$ ~/writing
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
closedjdk.com
JDK
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
andrezsanchez.com
Software, mathematics, language, and more.
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
nevadastart.com
Nevada Start | I’m a software developer and sometimes musician, working mainly with Ruby and Javascript.
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
rohinibarla.com
Rohini Kumar Barla
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
romanboba.com
Roman Boba
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
aaccurso.me
Alan Accurso
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
bluehood.dev
home | codekobold.io
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
robertwpearce.com
Robert Pearce
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
belajarswift.com
BelajarSwift | BelajarSwift
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
abenezer.org
Abenezer Belachew / Software Developer
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.