Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to aedev.me

interlude-mike.github.io | Mike · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
70match
theproblow.com
problow.github.io | ProBlow
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
farrimond.com
jfarrimo.github.io
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
roboschreiber.com
roboschreiber.github.io | Robo Schreiber
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
interlinklabs.ai
Interlink
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
thepfaff.com
home | mike pfaffroth
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
solomonshadow.com
GitHub Guide
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
disruptionpoint.com
Disruption Point | Mike Ianiro | Substack
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
interlockstudios.com
Interlock Studios
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
l-oj.com
larry-oj · GitHub
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
nflverse.com
nflverse · GitHub
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
dita-users.com
DITA Users · GitHub
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
thepotato.dev
ThePotatoGuy · GitHub
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
aguiar.cloud
Fabricio Aguiar - GitHub
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
invition.dev
iNViTiON (MiX) · GitHub
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
mattchard.com
mchar7 (Matt) · GitHub
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
benedikt-lohse.dev
LinuxTux23 (bl) · GitHub
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
kyleprouty.com
prouty.io | Data Engineer
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
mb-media.net
vonWeihermuehle · GitHub
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.