Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to aecv.dev

Aldo Caniz | Front-End Developer · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
72match
alexandralim.dev
Alexandra Lim | Front End Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
71match
gregbabula.com
Front End Development
2 shared topicsweb-development
70match
kristiannielsen.com
Kristian Nielsen - Frontend Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
69match
felipe-pita.com
Felipe Pita | Backend Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
68match
faridsalomon.com
Farid Salomon | Backend Developer
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
68match
doehler-systems.com
Alfredo Pineda | Backend Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
68match
3dime.com
Idriss - Backend Developer Portfolio
2 shared topicsweb-development
68match
fatihozkurt.com
Fatih Özkurt | Java Backend Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
68match
akshaysakhare.dev
Akshay Sakhare | Java Backend Developer
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
68match
nextleveldeveloper.com
Next Level Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
68match
ioannisvossos.com
Ioannis Vossos - Junior Backend Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
67match
domoramas.com
Dom Oramas, Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
67match
fatihali.com
Fatih Ali | Developer
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
67match
thepolyglotdeveloper.com
The Polyglot Developer
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
67match
farkie.dev
Farkie – Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
67match
kubrabol.dev
Kübra Bol | Full Stack Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
67match
aarab.tech
Hamza Aarab | Full Stack Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
67match
binhtd.dev
BINH TRAN - Self Studied Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.