Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to aead.dev

aead (Andreas Auernhammer) · GitHub · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
84match
alenzen.net
Luncher91 (Andreas Lenzen) · GitHub
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
82match
a-jd.dev
a-jd (AJ Dave) · GitHub
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
82match
matbab.com
Mes-ser (Messer) · GitHub
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
81match
andyroxby.me
aroxby (Andy Roxby) · GitHub
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
81match
bellmer.me
eBellmer (Ethan Bellmer) · GitHub
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
81match
aericson.me
aericson (André Ericson) · GitHub
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
81match
achm6174.com
achm6174 (Andy Chung) · GitHub
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
81match
andybell.dev
Andy-Bell (Andy Bell) · GitHub
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
81match
andy-bell.dev
Andy-Bell (Andy Bell) · GitHub
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
80match
aaix.dev
aaix (aidan) · GitHub
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
80match
1lt.dev
1LtFord · GitHub
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
80match
inueni.com
Inueni · GitHub
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
80match
aron-schneider.com
aronsch (Aron Schneider) · GitHub
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
80match
aericio.net
Aericio · GitHub
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
80match
rokit.dev
trey-k · GitHub
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
80match
niapoor.com
niapoor (Nia Poor) · GitHub
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
80match
robrua.com
robrua (Rob Rua) · GitHub
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
80match
faqeel.dev
faqeel (Fares) · GitHub
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.