Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to aea-net.org

AEAweb: The American Economic Association · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
72match
avekon.org
Eurasian Economists Association
1 shared topicseconomy
70match
a-paea.org
Asia-Pacific Applied Economics Association
1 shared topicseconomy
68match
aesri.org
AESRI | AFRICAN ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE
1 shared topicseconomy
68match
africaeconomicfoundation.net
Africa Economic Foundation
1 shared topicseconomy
68match
aissec.org
Aissec – Italian Association for the Study of Comparative Economic Systems
1 shared topicseconomy
68match
aep-online.my
Asian Economic Papers
1 shared topicseconomy
68match
afieln.org
African International Economic Law Network
1 shared topicseconomy
68match
keysianeconomics.com
keysian economics
1 shared topicseconomy
68match
acceglobal.org
Association of Certified Chartered Economists (ACCE)
1 shared topicseconomy
68match
namvphan.com
Nam Phan Economics
1 shared topicseconomy
67match
rgeconomicadvisors.com
RG Economic Advisors
1 shared topicseconomy
67match
patrioticeconomics.com
Patriotic Economics — The Manual for the Next America
1 shared topicseconomy
67match
cherokeenationimpact.com
The Cherokee Nation Economic Impact Report
1 shared topicseconomy
67match
africaeconomicsummit.org
Africa Economic Summit
1 shared topicseconomy
67match
tetofficial.com
The Economic Transcript
1 shared topicseconomy
67match
afdecnc.org
AfDEC | African Diaspora Economic Council
1 shared topicseconomy
67match
kingstoncanada.com
Kingston Economic Development Corporation
1 shared topicseconomy
66match
paulschaudt.com
Paul Schaudt | Associate Professor of Economics at KU Leuven
1 shared topicseconomy

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.