Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to adh.io

Resume - Andrew Hamon · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
70match
andrewjohnson.dev
Resume - Andrew A. Johnson - Lead Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
67match
andrewt.io
Andrew Thomas
2 shared topicsweb-development
67match
andrewrexroth.me
Andrew Rexroth
2 shared topicsweb-development
67match
andrewstanton.tech
Andrew Stanton
2 shared topicsweb-development
66match
andrewrodebaugh.dev
Andrew Rodebaugh
2 shared topicsweb-development
66match
robertcraigwallace.com
Resume Landing Page
2 shared topicsweb-development
65match
alexander-vilalta-resume.com
Vilalta Resume
2 shared topicsweb-development
65match
ktitarov.com
Resume | Anatoly Ktitarov
2 shared topicsweb-development
64match
aruizweb.com
RStill - CV/Resume
2 shared topicsweb-development
64match
nicholas-pace.com
Nick's Resume
2 shared topicsweb-development
64match
andrewgretton.com
Andrew Gretton - in a nutshell
2 shared topicsweb-development
64match
ahmedkhairy.dev
Ahmed Khairy's Resume
2 shared topicsweb-development
64match
codev.uk 🇬🇧
Marc Sutton - Resume - Cross-disciplinary Systems Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
64match
arthurjautz.com
Arthur J. Autz | Resume
2 shared topicsweb-development
64match
alexandrosgkiorgkinis.com
Alexandros Gkiorgkinis — Retro Resume
2 shared topicsweb-development
64match
andrewrobertcollins.com
Andrew Collins — Full Stack Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
64match
mazentaha.com
Mazen Taha – Resume
2 shared topicsweb-development
64match
nicholasbarnette.com
Nicholas Barnette | Resume
2 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.