Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to adexa.com

Eyelit Technologies · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
77match
rgdtech.com
RGD Technologies
1 shared topicsmanufacturing-industry
77match
itraptech.com
iTrap Technologies -
1 shared topicsmanufacturing-industry
77match
itraptechnologies.com
iTrap Technologies -
1 shared topicsmanufacturing-industry
76match
divistechnologies.com
DIVIS TECHNOLOGIES
1 shared topicsmanufacturing-industry
76match
nxustechnologies.com
Nexus Technologies
1 shared topicsmanufacturing-industry
76match
bazell.com
Bazell Technologies
1 shared topicsmanufacturing-industry
76match
motiontechnologies-india.com
Motion Technologies
1 shared topicsmanufacturing-industry
76match
plastilab-tech.com
Plastilab Technologies
1 shared topicsmanufacturing-industry
75match
heliozgroup.com
Home – Helioz Technologies
1 shared topicsmanufacturing-industry
75match
helioztech.com
Home – Helioz Technologies
1 shared topicsmanufacturing-industry
75match
helioztechnologies.com
Home – Helioz Technologies
1 shared topicsmanufacturing-industry
75match
heliozventures.com
Home – Helioz Technologies
1 shared topicsmanufacturing-industry
75match
cadencetech.net
Cadence Technologies
1 shared topicsmanufacturing-industry
75match
cadencetechnologies.com
Cadence Technologies
1 shared topicsmanufacturing-industry
75match
cadencedirect.com
Cadence Technologies
1 shared topicsmanufacturing-industry
75match
cadencedistribution.com
Cadence Technologies
1 shared topicsmanufacturing-industry
75match
cadencedist.com
Cadence Technologies
1 shared topicsmanufacturing-industry
75match
shepherdtechnologies.com
Shepherd Technologies
1 shared topicsmanufacturing-industry

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.