similar sites

Browse

AI Report Tools

Sites similar to adesdoc.com.br

Adesdoc alternatives & similar sites

ADESDOC – Associação dos despachantes documentalistas de Minas Gerais — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Civic Affairs →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
adotesc.com.br ↗	72 match 1 shared topics	Adotesc – Associação dos Despachantes de Trânsito do Estado de Santa Catarina	BR pt	civic-affairs WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
adasc.net.br ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	ADASC – Associação de Desenvolvimento dos Amigos de Santa Catarina.	BR pt	civic-affairs WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
adespdf.org.br ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	ADESP-DF – Associação dos Gestores Públicos do Distrito Federal	BR pt	civic-affairs WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
aceg-rs.com.br ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	ACEG – RS – Associação Dos Cronistas Esportivos Gaúchos	BR pt	civic-affairs WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
agesp.org.br ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	AGESP – Associação dos Gestores Públicos do Estado de São Paulo	BR pt	civic-affairs WordPress	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
aeppsp.org.br ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	AGESP – Associação dos Gestores Públicos do Estado de São Paulo	BR pt	civic-affairs WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
accacaucaia.com.br ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	ACCA Caucaia – Associação Colinas de Caucaia do Alto	BR pt	civic-affairs WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
adpema.com.br ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	ADPEMA – Associação dos Defensores Públicos do Estado do Maranhão	BR pt	civic-affairs WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
abominas.org.br ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	ABO MG - Associação Brasileira de Ouvidores/Ombudsman Seção Minas Gerais	BR pt	civic-affairs WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ajuferjes.org.br ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	AJUFERJES – Associação dos Juízes Federais do Rio de Janeiro e Espírito Santo	BR pt	civic-affairs WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
aess.com.br ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	AESS - Associação de Estudantes de Serra do Salitre	BR pt	civic-affairs	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
afpm.com.br ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	AFPM – Associação dos Funcionários Públicos Municipais	BR pt	civic-affairs WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
aacn.com.br ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	AACN - Associação dos Amigos da Cultura	BR pt	civic-affairs WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
aclux.com.br ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	ACLUX – Associação dos Cidadãos Luxemburgueses no Brasil	BR pt	civic-affairs WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
afup.com.br ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	AFUP - Associação dos Funcionários da Prefeitura de Machado	BR pt	civic-affairs WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
aabnb.com.br ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	AABNB - Associação dos Funcionários Aposentados do BNB	BR pt	civic-affairs WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ajuris.org.br ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	AJURIS \| Associação dos Juízes do Rio Grande do Sul	BR pt	civic-affairs WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
aarb.org.br ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	AARB - Associação das Autoridades de Registro do Brasil	BR pt	civic-affairs WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.