Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to addware.net

Home · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
85match
fnstudio.it 🇮🇹
Home
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
85match
techpedia.it 🇮🇹
HOME
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
devidea.it 🇮🇹
Home
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
64match
techout.it 🇮🇹
TechOut - Home
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
62match
ipg-system.com
Home | IPG System - Platform
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
60match
aclegg2011.com
Aclegg2011, Android Developer
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
60match
andrewtpagan.com
Andrew Pagan
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
60match
b612manager.com
B612 Studio Manager
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
60match
aristoneventi.com
Accesso - Tool Eventi
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
60match
codicon.com
Codicons™
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
60match
fcervigni.com
Francesco Cervigni
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
60match
nicolasricardi.com
Nicolas Ricardi
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
60match
appturbo.it 🇮🇹
Mobile App Development - App Turbo
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
60match
appleshare.it 🇮🇹
AppleShare IT
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
60match
androiddevs.it 🇮🇹
ADI | Android Developers Italia
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
60match
bettersoftware.it 🇮🇹
Better Software - BetterSoftware
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
60match
concorsovelluti.it 🇮🇹
Project Reader - Microsoft Project Viewer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
60match
delvr.it 🇮🇹
Bjoern Stuetz | .binary-two.net
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.