Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to addlink.cat

Addlink Software Científico · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
71match
arkasoftware.com
.: Arka Software :.
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
71match
sgb-software.es 🇪🇸
SGB SOFTWARE
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
71match
jmsoftware.es 🇪🇸
JM Software
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
70match
wabisoftware.es 🇪🇸
Wabi Software ES
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
70match
smjsoftware.es 🇪🇸
SMJ Software S.L.U.
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
70match
qualitysoftware.es 🇪🇸
Quality Software
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
70match
alicitasoftware.es 🇪🇸
Alicita, Software
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
70match
fixiocode.com
Fixio | Software Factory
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
70match
fixiostore.com
Fixio | Software Factory
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
69match
bmsoftware.tech
BM Software - Best Minds
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
69match
fazpats.com
FazPats — Software Solutions
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
69match
neurolexia.com
Neurolexia Software
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
69match
koresolutions.dev
Kore Solutions | Software Mac
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
69match
irsoftware.es 🇪🇸
Inicio - IR Software de Control
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
69match
fcocea.dev
Francisco Cea — Software Engineer
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
69match
dstsoftware.es 🇪🇸
DST Software
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
69match
gsisoftware.es 🇪🇸
GSI Software
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
69match
easysoftware.es 🇪🇸
Inicio | Easy Software
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.