Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to addisonmcknight.com

Addison McKnight – An Imperfect Plan · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
70match
askdave.net
David Knight – Author
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
69match
laceknight.com
LACE KNIGHT – Fall in LOVE with Reading
2 shared topicsfiction
68match
krupage.com
Krupa Ge – Author
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
mayquistbooks.com
Kit Mayquist – Author etc.
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
67match
anlynhansell.com
Anlyn Hansell, Author – anlynhansell.com
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
67match
maurapierlot.com
maura pierlot – Author and Playwright
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
67match
fayebrann.com
FAYE BRANN – AUTHOR
2 shared topicsfiction
67match
armidabooks.com
Armida Books – Armida Books
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
67match
armidapublications.com
Armida Books – Armida Books
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
67match
kristenroedel.com
Kristen Roedel – Author
2 shared topicsfiction
67match
masonmckenziewriter.com
Mason McKenzie – Crime & Fantasy Writer
2 shared topicsfiction
67match
ashleyschaller.com
Ashley Schaller – Author
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
67match
addisonarmstrong.com
Addison Armstrong – Author of Historical Fiction
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
67match
robertmcouat.com
Robert C. McOuat – Writer
2 shared topicsfiction
67match
andrewdyhin.com
Andrew Dyhin – Author and innovator
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
67match
dm-deluca.com
D.M. DeLuca – Author
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
67match
mathiesonauthor.com
MAT HIESON – Author
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
67match
maureenfischer.com
MaureenFischer – Writer
2 shared topicsfiction

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.