similar sites

‹ Profile AI Report Tools

Sites similar to addison.im

jbenzshawel (Addison Benzshawel) · GitHub · ranked by shared content topics & relevance

AlexBethel (Alex Bethel) · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

armsnyder (Adam Snyder) · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

faqeel (Fares) · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

Andy-Bell (Andy Bell) · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

Andy-Bell (Andy Bell) · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

newmanhaasracing.com

danielcary (Daniel) · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

Rogze (Romain Zwiebel) · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

softwareblair.dev

SoftwareBlair · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

aaix (aidan) · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

dgrdl (Doğa Gürdal) · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

arrufat (Adrià Arrufat) · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

trey-k · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

a-jd (AJ Dave) · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

cousinbenson (Bob Hall) · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

softwaresing.dev

SoftwareSing (soft) · GitHub

2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications

alecvdp (Alec) · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

Inueni · GitHub

2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications

ben181231 (Ben Lei) · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.