Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to adamrdev.com

Adam Reeves - Software Engineer · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
86match
brandonjshaffer.com
Brandon James Shaffer | Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
82match
aarrcon.com
Aarrcon Engineers
2 shared topicsweb-development
78match
jsteagle.dev
Justus - Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
77match
abroro.com
abroro - Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
76match
ataekren.com
Ata Ekren - Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
76match
brandondrake.dev
Brandon Drake - Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
76match
alexanderpang.net
Alex Pang - Software Engineer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
76match
andyhume.net
Andy Hume - Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
76match
abhayvatsa.com
Abhay Vatsa - Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
76match
ed-li.com
Edward Li - Software Engineer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
76match
candidosales.me
Home | Candido Sales - Software Engineer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
76match
adambcomer.com
Adam Comer | Software Engineer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
76match
mozafarshah.com
Mozafar Shah - Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
76match
juandk.com
Juan | Software Engineer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
76match
justinthareja.com
Justin Thareja - Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
75match
angusblomley.com
Angus Blomley - Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
75match
aboff.com
Michael Aboff - Software Engineer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
75match
mwaboff.com
Michael Aboff - Software Engineer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.