similar sites

‹ Profile AI Report Tools

Sites similar to adamoreilly.com

github · ranked by shared content topics & relevance

Redite · GitHub

1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

Lioness100 · GitHub

1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

AterraEngine · GitHub

1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

Fabricio Aguiar - GitHub

1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

andrewlmartin.dev

AndrewR3K (Andrew) · GitHub

1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

owdevel (Owen Mak) · GitHub

1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

simon-mo (Simon Mo) · GitHub

1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

The Vegan Bug Bakery · GitHub

1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

vankxr (João Silva) · GitHub

1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

sczech (Simon Czech) · GitHub

1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

Busy Sloths Community · GitHub

1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

Libre Forestia Online · GitHub

1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

albatross-kb.com

Library of Possibility · GitHub

1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

jros92 (Jörg Schmidt) · GitHub

1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

idno0001 (Anthony Chiu) · GitHub

1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

rpetrich (Ryan Petrich) · GitHub

1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

Alchemyst0x (Alchemyst) · GitHub

1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

alexf0xdev (alexf0xdev) · GitHub

1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.