similar sites

‹ Profile AI Report Tools

Sites similar to adammck.com

adammck (Adam Mckaig) · GitHub · ranked by shared content topics & relevance

adamgauthier (Adam Gauthier) · GitHub

1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

andrewlmartin.dev

AndrewR3K (Andrew) · GitHub

1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

Redite · GitHub

1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

Lioness100 · GitHub

1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

alexskrypnyk.com

AlexSkrypnyk (Alex Skrypnyk) · GitHub

1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

AterraEngine · GitHub

1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

eigenpaul (paul) · GitHub

1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

HoussemNasri (Houssem Nasri) · GitHub

1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

lucaspetrini.com

lfpetrini (Lucas Petrini) · GitHub

1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

owdevel (Owen Mak) · GitHub

1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

abraham (Abraham Williams) · GitHub

1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

vankxr (João Silva) · GitHub

1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

jros92 (Jörg Schmidt) · GitHub

1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

sczech (Simon Czech) · GitHub

1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

elementfoundry.com

elementfoundry · GitHub

1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

simon-mo (Simon Mo) · GitHub

1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

lucashecht (Lucas Hecht) · GitHub

1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

LukasBrand (Lukas Brand) · GitHub

1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.