Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to adamldavis.com

Adam L. Davis · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
69match
adambarnhard.com
adam barnhard
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
67match
adamrenklint.com
Adam Renklint
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
66match
adambaker.org
Adam Baker
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
65match
adamcoffman.dev
adam coffman
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
65match
adamborowski.dev
Adam Borowski
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
65match
sioncodes.com
SionCodes.
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
65match
siditaduli.com
Programming blog: Examples, Exercises and Solutions - Sidita Duli
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
adamkarmelrozkosz.dev
Adam
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
ebdavidson.com
Elijah Davidson
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
homeofprogrammingsoftware.com
Introduction to programming software and programming languages | homeofprogrammingsoftware
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
brunorb.com
Structure and Interpretation of Bruno's Code
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
bugarin.dev
bugarin
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
juliano-alves.com
Juliano Alves
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
bukno.com
indentit
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
cosycoding.com
Cosycoding | I write about my journey as software developer.
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
aleksandarskrbic.com
Aleksandar Skrbic
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
angelleleger.net
Angelle Leger - Angelle Leger
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
bugraozkan.com
Buğra Özkan
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.