Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to adamcoffman.dev

adam coffman · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
66match
adambaker.org
Adam Baker
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
66match
adambarnhard.com
adam barnhard
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
65match
adamrenklint.com
Adam Renklint
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
65match
adamborowski.dev
Adam Borowski
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
65match
adamkarmelrozkosz.dev
Adam
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
codecoffee.dev
Home | Code Coffee
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
adamcolton.net
Adam Colton | What I've learned so far
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
codingwithoutcoffee.com
Coding without Coffee
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
fiedlr.com
All Posts | Adam Fiedler
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
codecoffeeproject.com
The Code & Coffee Project
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
codecloudandcoffee.com
Home - Code Cloud & Coffee
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
bmcompiler.tech
BM Compiler
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
adamtornhill.com
Adam Tornhill's Programming Pages
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
belderbos.dev
Bob Belderbos | Developer & Team Coaching
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
adampreble.net
Adam Preble – Cocoa, Trains, and Pinball
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
coffeescriptinaction.com
CoffeeScript in Action
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
3alampro.com
عالم البرمجة
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
adamant-lang.org
The Adamant Programming Language
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.