Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to adamborowski.dev

Adam Borowski · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
69match
adambaker.org
Adam Baker
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
68match
adambarnhard.com
adam barnhard
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
65match
adamcoffman.dev
adam coffman
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
65match
adamrenklint.com
Adam Renklint
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
adamkarmelrozkosz.dev
Adam
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
kubukoz.com
Jakub Kozłowski
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
piotrkozanowski.com
Piotr Kozanowski's blog
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
adamtornhill.com
Adam Tornhill's Programming Pages
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
cnburrows.com
C. N. Burrows
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
arnedebo.com
Arne de Borman
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
thepugautomatic.com
The Pug Automatic
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
adampreble.net
Adam Preble – Cocoa, Trains, and Pinball
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
adamcolton.net
Adam Colton | What I've learned so far
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
61match
adamant-lang.org
The Adamant Programming Language
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
61match
adamnengland.com
Adam N England – Professional Software Engineer, Amateur Human Being
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
61match
aboutchris.net
Christopher Egger – Software & Automation Developer
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
61match
nexocore.dev
Nexo - A scripting language for real workflows | Pipeline-first automation
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
60match
accu.org
ACCU
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.