Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to activistgroup.org

Lawrence Hart Institute – Poetry Built to Last · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
85match
activistpoets.org
Lawrence Hart Institute – Poetry Built to Last
2 shared topicspoetry
68match
billhollandspoetry.com
Bill Hollands – Poetry
2 shared topicspoetry
67match
arialigi.com
Aria Ligi – Poet
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
67match
maysmuse.com
Mays Muse – A Poetry Pit Stop
2 shared topicspoetry
67match
divyakamath.com
Divya Writes Stuff – Poetry and Prose
2 shared topicspoetry
67match
bluepoet.org
Blue Poet – poetry about grief and life
2 shared topicspoetry
67match
featheredstag.com
Feathered Stag Press – Poetry Publisher
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
67match
billjenkinspoet.com
Bill Jenkins – Poet
2 shared topicspoetry
67match
fatimazehramalik.com
fatima malik – poet
2 shared topicspoetry
67match
arisawhite.com
Arisa White – Poet, Writer, Educator
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
66match
ashevillepoetryreview.com
Asheville Poetry Review – Literary Excellence since 1993
2 shared topicspoetry
66match
kylecarrerolopez.com
Kyle Carrero Lopez – Poet
2 shared topicspoetry
66match
maureenbjones.com
Maureen Buchanan Jones – Poetry & Fiction Author
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
66match
thepoetryvault.com
The Poetry Vault – Relax and Read
2 shared topicspoetry
66match
albionbooks.net
Albion Books – A Poetry Micropress
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
66match
ars-lirica.com
Ars Lirica – Poetry and prose of Rebekkah Hilgraves
2 shared topicspoetry
66match
niamhoconnell.com
Niamh O'Connell – Poet
2 shared topicspoetry
66match
abigailardellezammit.net
Abigail Ardelle Zammit – Poet
2 shared topicspoetry

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.