Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to activefingers.com

Active Fingers · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
69match
pagan.dev
Pagan Interactive
2 shared topicsweb-development
68match
loopbacklogic.com
Loopback Logic LLC
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
67match
kaanjiiru.com
LiST Interactive
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
67match
mrzm-labs.com
MRZM-Labs - Innovative IT Solutions
2 shared topicsweb-development
67match
pan-infotech.com
PAN Infotech | Innovative Software Solutions
2 shared topicsweb-development
67match
4fingers.dev
4fingers – Freelance Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
67match
purpledotdigital.co.uk 🇬🇧
Purple Dot Digital - Innovative Creations
2 shared topicsweb-development
67match
burcion.net
Interactive Solutions.
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
67match
reimaginedyield.com
ReimaginedYield
2 shared topicsweb-development
66match
sifronix.com
Sifronix
2 shared topicsweb-development
66match
acodershub.com
A Coder's Hub | Software Development & It Solutions
2 shared topicsweb-development
66match
caasijones.com
CaasiJones Softwares | Innovative Digital Solutions from Nairobi
2 shared topicsweb-development
66match
corteksolution.com
CortekSolution - Innovative Software Solutions
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
66match
looperex.com
Home | Looperex
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
66match
loopcoder.com
Loopcoder - Do loop for while
2 shared topicsweb-development
66match
builtbyastro.com
Astro - Innovative Solutions
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
66match
ecorlabs.com
EcorLabs - Software Development Company
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
66match
fuchsdev.com
fuchsdev | Software Development Studio
2 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.