Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to acromondx.com

AcromondX - Software Craftsman · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
77match
furkanayilmaz.com
Furkan Ayilmaz - Software Craftsman
1 shared topicsweb-development
75match
paracosm.mx 🇲🇽
Gerardo Nille - Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
75match
akshaymondal.com
Akshay Mondal - Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
73match
lstebner.com
luke stebner - software engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
72match
create-element.com
createElement() - Software crafted by developers and designers
1 shared topicsweb-development
72match
juanlozada.com
Juan Lozada - Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
72match
jwsmithdev.com
Jordan Smith - Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
71match
reinhardtdev.com
Reinhardt Lagat | Software engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
71match
bruceldev.com
Bruce Lee - Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
71match
thebuilderbob.com
Bob Le - Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
71match
pangaia-systems.co.uk 🇬🇧
Pangaia Systems - Software Development
1 shared topicsweb-development
71match
alamdev.tech
Alam | Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
71match
simosoftware.com
SIMO Software
1 shared topicsweb-development
71match
andrewdeck.dev
Andrew Deck | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
71match
ebasoftware.com
EBA Software
1 shared topicsweb-development
71match
justinfunk.com
Senior Software Engineer in Santa Fe, NM | Justin Funk
1 shared topicsweb-development
71match
juliangrande.com
Julian Grande — Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
71match
andynewman.dev
Andy Newman - Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.