Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to acredick.com

Home | Journalist Portfolio · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
74match
lucy-baker.com
Journalist of the Year Portfolio
3 shared topicsmedia-industry
71match
pamelaengel.com
Pamela Engel | journalist
3 shared topicsmedia-industry
69match
ebonyreed.com
Journalist | Ebony Reed
3 shared topicsmedia-industry
68match
eddiemccoven.com
Eddie McCoven – Journalist
3 shared topicsmedia-industry
68match
alexplucas.net
Alex Lucas – Portfolio
3 shared topicsmedia-industry
67match
luciaweiss.com
Lucia Weiss – journalist, writer
3 shared topicsmedia-industry
67match
algeriajournal.net
Home - algeriajournal
3 shared topicsmedia-industry
67match
juliabarajas.com
Julia Barajas – Journalist · Periodista
3 shared topicsmedia-industry
67match
louiselazell.com
Louise Lazell – Trainee Journalist
3 shared topicsmedia-industry
67match
sindujarangarajan.com
Sinduja Rangarajan - Data Journalist
3 shared topicsmedia-industry
67match
juliannazarionews.com
Julian Nazario – Student Journalist
3 shared topicsmedia-industry
67match
annahuntsman.com
ANNA HUNTSMAN – Multimedia Journalist
3 shared topicsmedia-industry
67match
pagerresearch.com
PAGER – Independent Journalism
3 shared topicsmedia-industry
66match
andrewfordnews.com
Andrew Ford | Homepage for Andrew Ford, journalist
3 shared topicsmedia-industry
66match
ashley-kirk.com
Ashley Kirk – Data and visual journalist
3 shared topicsmedia-industry
66match
panbd.com
A Journey to Fair Journalism | PANBD
3 shared topicsmedia-industry
66match
page38news.com
Independent Journalism - PAGE 38 NEWS
3 shared topicsmedia-industry
66match
theboldmic.com
The BOLD Mic | Journalism. Smart Readers. Real Impact.
3 shared topicsmedia-industry

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.