Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to acrack.dev

Acrack.dev - Portfolio Personal · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
70match
alexfdzg05.tech
My Portfolio
1 shared topicsweb-development
68match
argomez.com
Argomez | Portfolio técnico personal, desarrollo web y sistemas
1 shared topicsweb-development
68match
matcondev.com
MATCONDEV.COM | Portfolio Profesional
1 shared topicsweb-development
68match
aleixcamacho.dev
Aleix Camacho Ochoa - Portfolio
1 shared topicsweb-development
68match
ricardotovart.com
Dev Portfolio | Backend Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
67match
adriancosta.dev
Adrián Costa Rodríguez - Portfolio
1 shared topicsweb-development
67match
alejandromperis.dev
Portfolio - Alejandro Moya Peris
1 shared topicsweb-development
67match
angiematiz.tech
Angie Matiz — portfolio
1 shared topicsweb-development
67match
benitohuerta.net
Portfolio - Benito Huerta
1 shared topicsweb-development
67match
pieroallccaco.com
Piero Allccaco | Portfolio
1 shared topicsweb-development
67match
grounnydev.com
grounnydev — Portfolio · Desarrollador
1 shared topicsweb-development
67match
alejandroromero.dev
Portfolio - Alejandro Romero
1 shared topicsweb-development
67match
facusando.com
Portfolio - Facundo Sandoval
1 shared topicsweb-development
66match
mateorobles.com
Mateo Robles — Portfolio & Impostor
1 shared topicsweb-development
66match
aarongonzalez.dev
Aarón González — Portfolio
1 shared topicsweb-development
66match
albertoortiz.dev
Alberto Ortiz Arribas | Portfolio
1 shared topicsweb-development
66match
facvdev.com
Facvdev | Portafolio
1 shared topicsweb-development
66match
tiendarapida.es 🇪🇸
Tienda Virtual Personalizada:
1 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.