Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to ackermann.digital

Daniel Ackermann · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
63match
koray-birenheide.com
Koray Birenheide - Software Architect & Japanologist
2 shared topicsweb-development
63match
akmann.dev
Henry Akmann
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
kubat.dev
Patrick Kubat | Freiberuflicher Softwareentwickler
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
61match
alexander-kruska.dev
Portfolio - Alexander Kruska
2 shared topicsweb-development
60match
birck.org
TB-Ware - Visual Basic & PHP-Scripte von Torben Birck
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
60match
pincservices.de 🇩🇪
+INC
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
60match
networkingpros.net
overdestructively Lithesomeness xylography polyonymic rewardedly
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
60match
newwaves.dev
newwaves
2 shared topicsweb-development
60match
bodewig.dev
Lars Bodewig - Bodewig.dev
2 shared topicsweb-development
60match
reddeb.de 🇩🇪
reddeb.de — Open-Source · Hobby · KI · Linux
2 shared topicsweb-development
60match
alexgamingdev.tech
Alexander Dennhoven | Software Architect & Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
60match
aikin.me
Kin'blog
2 shared topicsweb-development
60match
booyage.com
Booyage Entwicklerhandbuch – Überblick
2 shared topicsweb-development
60match
fanstoss.com
piganis.de - Thomas Butzbach
2 shared topicsweb-development
60match
nek0peko.com
nek0peko-blog
2 shared topicsweb-development
60match
pevelopment.com
PE | Ein Blog über Softwareentwicklung von Ema & Patrick
2 shared topicsweb-development
60match
pfoffie.dev
Pfoffie.dev programmiert dir alles.
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
60match
php-lovers.com
PHP-Lovers – Deine PHP-Community
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.