similar sites

Browse

AI Report Tools

Sites similar to acher.com.br

Acher alternatives & similar sites

Acher Treinamentos – Capacitação corporativa de soft skills para empresas — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Vocational Training →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
urplux.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Urplux — LMS de treinamento corporativo auditável	pt	vocational-training	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
luglitraining.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Lugli Corporate Training • Empresa Internacional de Treinamento	pt	vocational-training WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
academiaderesultadosar.com.br ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Academia de Resultados – Treinamento	BR pt	vocational-training WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
3mariaspalmas.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	3mariaz \| Capacitação para Prestação de Serviços \| Palmas PR	pt	vocational-training Wix	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
abrtreinamentos.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	ABR Treinamentos	pt	vocational-training WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
excelformacao.pt ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	ExcelFormação - Formação Comercial e Liderança para Empresas	PT pt	vocational-training WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
7set.com.br ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	7Set – Treinamentos & Consultorias	BR pt	vocational-training WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
2mseguranca.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	2M Gestão & Treinamentos – Segurança do Trabalho e Saúde Ocupacional	pt	vocational-training WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
abmtreinamentos.com.br ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	ABM Treinamentos	BR pt	vocational-training	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
actcert.com.br ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	ACT Cert - Certificação e Treinamento em Sistemas de Gestão	BR pt	vocational-training	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
ctcff.org ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	CTQFF - Centro de Treinamento e Qualificação Fernando Fragata	pt	vocational-training WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ctqff.org ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	CTQFF - Centro de Treinamento e Qualificação Fernando Fragata	pt	vocational-training WordPress	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
abztreinamentos.com.br ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	ABZ Centro de Treinamentos em Santa Maria/RS	BR pt	vocational-training	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
abctreinamentos.com.br ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Home 2026 - ABC Treinamentos	BR pt	vocational-training WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cursobrigadadeincendio.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Curso Brigada de Incêndio – Treinamento que Salva Vidas	pt	vocational-training WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
2atreinamentosst.com.br ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Home - 2A – Treinamento e Assessoria	BR pt	vocational-training WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
3dbot.com.br ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Capacitação Clínica em Alinhadores Estéticos Natal - CPGO	BR pt	vocational-training WordPress WooCommerce	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
hdilatam.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	HDI Brasil \| Capacitação de profissionais de TI em serviços	pt	vocational-training Joomla	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.