Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to acgreenlee.com

A.C. Greenlee · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
69match
lorrainepearl.com
Lorraine Pearl
2 shared topicsromance
67match
tessa-kane.com
Tessa Kane – MM Paranormal Romance
2 shared topicsromance
67match
paige-addams.com
paigeaddams | Paranormal Romance
2 shared topicsromance
65match
pamelalyn.com
Lyn Brittan - Lyn Brittan
2 shared topicsromance
65match
brynneweaverbooks.com
Romance Author | Brynne Weaver Books
2 shared topicsromance
65match
sidneyayers.com
Sidney Ayers - Sinfully Snarky Paranormal Romance - Demons Unleashed - Humorous Paranormal Romance
2 shared topicsromance
65match
julianastone.com
Juliana Stone Author of Contemporary Romance, Paranormal Romance and Young Adult Fiction Novels
2 shared topicsromance
65match
lottiemathews.com
Lottie Mathews
2 shared topicsromance
64match
atkumagai.com
a.t.kumagai – Fantasy Romance Author
2 shared topicsromance
64match
theadevine.com
Thea Devine
2 shared topicsromance
64match
reginaruddmerrick.com
Regina Rudd Merrick - Inspirational Romance Author
2 shared topicsromance
64match
rebeccamain.com
Rebecca Main — Paranormal Romance Author — Follow the Magic – A Darker Shade of Paranormal Magic
2 shared topicsromance
64match
msparker.com
M. S. Parker Books
2 shared topicsromance
63match
bunshima.com
Home / bunshima
2 shared topicsromance
63match
abbymaddison.com
- Romantasy Author • Wolf Shifters • Slow-Burn Romance
2 shared topicsromance
63match
jterbeek.com
JD Rivers - SFF Author
2 shared topicsromance
63match
lorinpetrazilka.com
Lorin Petrazilka Author- Romantasy Stories | Author Lorin Petrazilka
2 shared topicsromance
63match
louise-russell.com
Louise Russell
2 shared topicsromance

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.