Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to acave.dev

Ashley Cave · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
76match
ashleycoleman.me
Ashley Coleman
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
72match
ashleylavery.com
Ashley Lavery - Software Engineer
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
72match
ashleynelson.dev
Ashley Nelson
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
72match
ashleymarkfletcher.com
Ashley Fletcher
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
ashleyretherford.com
Hi, I'm Ashley
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
ashl.dev
Ashley's Corner
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
that-matt.com
Matt Button
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
ashleykcheng.com
ashleykcheng | Personal portfolio site
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
alex-schimpf.com
Alexander Schimpf - Software Engineer
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
alexander-schimpf.com
Alexander Schimpf - Software Engineer
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
alexschimpf.dev
Alexander Schimpf - Software Engineer
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
ashish.me
Ashish Patel
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
adityamohta.dev
Kumar Aditya Mohta
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
adrianmiles.io
Adrian Miles - Software Engineer
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
atakans.com
Atakan
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
atomaoim.com
Atom
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
burckman.com
Juan Fernando Sarmiento Burckhardt (Juan Burckhardt) – Software Engineer
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
loudquack.com
LoudQuack - The Hub for Software Engineers
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.