Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to acatalystjournal.org

Journal · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
78match
themijournal.com
MI JOURNAL
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
77match
mdejournal.com
MDE Journal
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
75match
iqrjournals.com
IQR Journals
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
75match
matjournals.com
MAT Journals
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
72match
fastlanejournal.com
Fastlane Journal
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
70match
airjournals.org
Home - AIR Journals
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
69match
insulajournal.com
Home - Insula Journal
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
69match
mdjoffers.com
Marietta Daily Journal
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
68match
academicjournalscenter.org
Academic Journals Center
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
68match
advancedjournaleditors.com
Advanced Journal Editors
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
68match
rjoffer.com
Las Vegas Review Journal
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
68match
interlinkjournals.com
Home - Interlink Journals
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
68match
aejonline.org
African Evaluation Journal
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
67match
aipp-journals.org
Journals - AIP Publishing LLC
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
67match
camdennewjournal.co.uk 🇬🇧
Homepage | Camden New Journal
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
67match
camdenreview.co.uk 🇬🇧
Homepage | Camden New Journal
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
66match
socialsignsreivew.com
Journal of Social Signs Review
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
66match
ronscherer.com
Ron Scherer - Writer/Journalist
1 shared topicspublishing-industry

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.