Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to acarthur.com

AC Arthur | Romance Author · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
89match
baynehan.com
Gay Romance Author & Artist
2 shared topicsromance
87match
anuember.com
Anu Ember | Fantasy Romance Author
2 shared topicsromance
86match
lydiablake.com
Lydia Blake | Fanasty Romance Author
2 shared topicsromance
85match
annehope.com
Anne Hope Romance Author Website Home Page
2 shared topicsromance
84match
pkstuart.com
P K Stuart – Paranormal Romance Author
2 shared topicsromance
83match
mabelhayes.com
Mabel Hayes – A Western Historical Romance Author
2 shared topicsromance
82match
anastasiaclitly.com
Anastasia C. Litly: Monster & Sentient Object Romance Author
2 shared topicsromance
82match
annaromer.com
Anna Romer Author
2 shared topicsromance
81match
annaashe.com
Author Anna Ashe – Dark. Fiery. Romance
2 shared topicsromance
80match
annablakely.com
Steamy Romantic Suspense | Author Anna Blakely
2 shared topicsromance
80match
bayouboysseries.com
Chris Cox – Author of LGBTQ Romantic Fiction
2 shared topicsromance
80match
eugeniariley.com
Eugenia Riley Time Travel Romances
2 shared topicsromance
79match
dinaarrudaauthor.com
Dina Arruda – Author
2 shared topicsromance
79match
angiedayauthor.com
Clean Fantasy Romance Book – Free Romantasy Novel
2 shared topicsromance
79match
islaspicyromance.com
Isla A. Mortimer – Spicy Dark Romance
2 shared topicsromance
79match
shevaundelucia.com
Shevaun DeLucia – Author
2 shared topicsromance
79match
sheamalloy.com
Shea Malloy – Action & Adventure Romance
2 shared topicsromance
78match
dilethadwaldon.com
Author Diletha D. Waldon
2 shared topicsromance

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.