Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to acarkaan.com

Kaan Acar · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
68match
burakkucuktopal.com
Burak Kucuktopal - Portfolio
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
66match
efeacar.com
Efe Acar | AI & Software Engineer
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
66match
bystan.tech
Stans
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
66match
thchar.com
Theo Charalambous
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
66match
julia-wang.dev
Julia L. Wang
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
66match
simonrueba.com
Home
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
66match
junhoyoon.com
Jun Ho Yoon Research
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
65match
achilov.dev
Davronbek Achilov - Software Architect & ML Engineer
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
65match
pangzirui.com
Zirui Pang - Homepage
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
65match
bziamah.tech
Bless Ziamah | Software Developer & ML Engineer
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
65match
alessandrozonta.net
Alessandro Zonta
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
65match
mujganagh.com
Mujgan Aghazada
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
65match
hohieu.com
Hieu Ho - AI Researcher & Software Engineer
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
65match
ankitg.me
Ankit Gupta
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
65match
juliekristen.com
Julie Kristen
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
65match
lorainefranke.com
Loraine Franke
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
65match
ashishgautam.dev
Ashish Gautam — Software Engineer
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
65match
jungjens.com
Jens Jung - Portfolio
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.