similar sites

Browse

AI Report Tools

Sites similar to acando.fi

Acando alternatives & similar sites

IT- ja liiketoimintakonsultoinnin palvelut | CGI FI — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Technology Industry →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
hseqs-palvelut.com ↗	34 match 1 shared topics	Hseqs-Palvelut Oy - Selkeyttä vaatimuksiin	fi	management-consulting-industry	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
anna-liisalamsa.com ↗	33 match 1 shared topics	Anna-Liisa Lämsän asiantuntijapalvelut	fi	management-consulting-industry	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
mconpartners.com ↗	31 match 1 shared topics	McCon Partners Oy – Tukea yritysten muutoksissa ja kehittämisessä	fi	management-consulting-industry WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
reptrust.com ↗	31 match 1 shared topics	Reputation and Trust Analytics	fi	management-consulting-industry WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
reputationanalytica.com ↗	31 match 1 shared topics	Reputation and Trust Analytics	fi	management-consulting-industry WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
reputationandtrust.com ↗	31 match 1 shared topics	Reputation and Trust Analytics	fi	management-consulting-industry WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
visiorapartners.com ↗	31 match 1 shared topics	Visiora Partners	fi	management-consulting-industry WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
industrialinternetnow.com ↗	30 match 1 shared topics	Industrial Internet Now	fi	technology-industry WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
beangroup.pro ↗	30 match 1 shared topics	B.E.A.N Group Oy	fi	management-consulting-industry	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
2kmediat.com ↗	27 match 1 shared topics	Koulutus- ja konsultointipalvelu KK Mediat - palvelutarjontamme	Finland~ fi	management-consulting-industry	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
daring-rotation.com ↗	27 match 1 shared topics	Daring Rotation - Liiketoimintaprosessien optimointi	fi	business-operations	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
kasvuhakkerointi.com ↗	24 match 1 shared topics	Kasvuhakkerointi – Tuloksellisen liiketoiminnan systemaattinen rakentaminen	fi	management-consulting-industry	robots llms aihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
helenahulkko.com ↗	23 match 1 shared topics	Viestintäkonsultti, vastuullisuuden kirkastaja, varainhankinnan osaaja	fi	management-consulting-industry WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
vitec-alma.com ↗	22 match 1 shared topics	Vitec ALMA \| Teknisen alan luotettu tietojärjestelmätoimittaja	fi	technology-industry	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
brookmanpartners.com ↗	21 match 1 shared topics	Brookman Partners - Taloushallinnon neuvontaa pk-yrityksille	fi	business-accounting-and-finance	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
kasvujohtaminen.com ↗	21 match 1 shared topics	Kasvujohtaminen – Käytännöllisiä malleja yritysten kasvuun ja johtamiseen	fi	executive-leadership-and-management WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
fabblo.com ↗	21 match 1 shared topics	FABBLO	fi	management-consulting-industry	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
steinheide.com ↗	20 match 1 shared topics	Steinheide \| Enhance Decision Making	fi	management-consulting-industry Squarespace Magento	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.