Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to academicbooks.com

Windows Booksellers · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
74match
ebbooksellers.com
East Bay Booksellers
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
73match
acequiabooksellers.com
Anthology Booksellers
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
72match
thebooksellerinc.com
The Bookseller, Inc
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
70match
hollanderbooks.com
Henry Hollander, Bookseller
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
70match
lopezbooks.com
Home | Ken Lopez Bookseller
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
70match
thebookgardenonline.com
Bookseller | The Book Garden
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
70match
thebookself.com
Bookself
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
69match
ahasbooks.lk
Ahas Books
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
longhousepoetry.com
Longhouse, Publishers & Booksellers - Home
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
ebook-bestsellers.com
eBook Best Sellers
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
burkesbooks.com
Burkes Books
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
byronsbooks.com
Byron's Books
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
audreysbooks.com
Audreys Books
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
cressbooks.com
- CReSS Books
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
munrobooks.com
Munro's Books
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
67match
juliansbooks.com
Julian's Books
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
67match
hitmedia.com
buy Derek Sivers books
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
67match
lorettalaybooks.com
jack the ripper books true crime bookseller
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.