Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to academiainsight.com

Academia Publishing Group · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
75match
arpgweb.com
Academic Research Publishing Group - ARPG
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
75match
acadpubl.org
Academic Publishing House
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
74match
academicledpublishingday.com
Academic-Led Publishing Day
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
72match
acp-testing.com
AC Publishing
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
72match
acpublishing.com
AC Publishing
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
72match
blueseapublishing.com
Bluesea Publishing
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
72match
acrpublishing.com
ACR Publishing
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
72match
a2npublishing.com
A2N Publishing
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
72match
sohopublishing.com
SoHo Publishing LLC
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
72match
agorapublishingireland.com
Agora Publishing Ireland
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
71match
algolpublishing.com
Algol Publishing
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
71match
bluegempublishing.com
Blue Gem Publishing |
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
71match
belantpublishing.com
BELANT Publishing
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
71match
bolidepublishing.com
Bolide Publishing
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
71match
mataaksara.com
Mata Aksara Publishing
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
71match
8northpublishing.com
8 North Publishing
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
71match
accents-publishing.com
Accents Publishing
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
71match
belmontpublishing.com
Belmont Publishing
1 shared topicspublishing-industry

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.