Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to aca.ax

ÅCA - Ålands Centralandelslag | Mejeri & Bageriprodukter · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
100match
alandsbagarn.ax
ÅCA - Ålands Centralandelslag | Mejeri & Bageriprodukter
1 shared topicsfood-industry
100match
alandsmejeriet.ax
ÅCA - Ålands Centralandelslag | Mejeri & Bageriprodukter
1 shared topicsfood-industry
62match
matskanner.com
MatSkanner Sverige - Skanna & Analysera Mat
1 shared topicsfood-industry
61match
faddman.com
Quality meat production | Fåddman
1 shared topicsfood-industry
61match
faddmandeliline.com
Quality meat production | Fåddman
1 shared topicsfood-industry
61match
bergstorkok.com
BERG Storkökspartner AB
1 shared topicsfood-industry
61match
slowfoodsapmi.com
Slow Food Sápmi – Gott, rent och rättvist
1 shared topicsfood-industry
61match
krogdirekt.com
Krogdirekt blir en del av Seiva – bättre villkor för restauranger
1 shared topicsfood-industry
61match
smakamera.com
Smakamera8
1 shared topicsfood-industry
61match
snaxsco.com
Hem - Evanoff Group
1 shared topicsfood-industry
60match
diskteknik.com
Diskteknik – nu en del av Martin & Servera | Martin & Servera
1 shared topicsfood-industry
60match
therestaurantlab.com
RESTAURANGLABBET
1 shared topicsfood-industry
31match
aktivbrands.com
Aktivbrands - Welcome
1 shared topicsfood-industry
31match
interbanan.com
Specialister på bananer | Interbanan
1 shared topicsagriculture
30match
kotthallensorunda.com
Kötthallen Sorunda
1 shared topicsfood-industry
30match
kottkultur.com
Norvida
1 shared topicsfood-industry
20match
matlagetimalmo.com
Matlaget Malmö
1 shared topicsfood-industry
20match
matlagetmalmo.com
Matlaget Malmö
1 shared topicsfood-industry

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.