Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to abur.io

Arthur Burnichon - Product Maker · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
70match
kurtisbodrogi.com
Kurtis Bodrogi — Product Manager
1 shared topicsstartups
69match
abdallaedres.com
Abdalla Edres - Product Manager | SaaS | Growth
1 shared topicsstartups
69match
arambarnett.dev
Aram Barnett - Product Engineer
1 shared topicsstartups
68match
arshtec.com
ARSHtec - Product-focused!
1 shared topicsstartups
68match
maxbeaubois.com
Max Beaubois - Product designer and founder
1 shared topicsstartups
68match
solopush.com
SoloPush - Product Hunt Alternative for Indie Makers
1 shared topicsstartups
68match
pinebase.io
Pinebase - Product Studio for Founders
1 shared topicsstartups
67match
ben-e.me
Benjamin Erxleben - Lead Product Designer
1 shared topicsstartups
67match
arshia.io
Arshia Moghaddam — Product Builder
1 shared topicsstartups
67match
baha.tech
Baker Baha — Entrepreneur & Product Leader
1 shared topicsstartups
67match
8li.io
8LI — Senior Product & Technical Partnership
1 shared topicsstartups
67match
8thlanei.com
8LI — Senior Product & Technical Partnership
1 shared topicsstartups
67match
adlk.io
Stefan Malzner — Product designer & founder of Franz
1 shared topicsstartups
67match
farahtsaraiva.com
Lucas Farahat | Staff Product Manager @ Deel
1 shared topicsstartups
67match
roimulia.com
Roi Mulia | Product Builder & Startup Mentor
1 shared topicsstartups
67match
farjadp.com
Startup Advisor & Product Strategist | Farjad .P
1 shared topicsstartups
66match
pimwillems.com
Pim Willems - Product lead for startups and scaleups
1 shared topicsstartups
66match
akshaj.me
Akshaj Jois | Product Specialist & Growth Lead
1 shared topicsstartups

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.