similar sites

‹ Profile AI Report Tools

Sites similar to absurdewelt.com

Start | absurdeWelt · ranked by shared content topics & relevance

Start - Buchsucht

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

buecherzauber-hdh.com

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

Start - ATHEODOC

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

oliversill.de 🇩🇪

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

pen-berlin.de 🇩🇪

Start - PEN Berlin.

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

penberlin.de 🇩🇪

Start - PEN Berlin.

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

cosima-verlag.com

Start | Cosima Verlag mit Villa des Lichts

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

buecherwelt.net

Startseite - buecherwelt.net

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

oliversautor.de 🇩🇪

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

orden-der-welt.de 🇩🇪

Orden der Welt - Start

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

newworkbooks.de 🇩🇪

Start | New Work Books | Experiencing - Learning - Doing

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

juttatreiber.com

Jutta Treiber Startseite

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

peter-siefermann.de 🇩🇪

Start - peter-siefermanns Webseite!

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

burckhardthaus.com

Startseite - ObersteBrink Shop

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

echo-microchip.com

Lesewelt Echo – Entdecken Sie neue Welten

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.