Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to abramczyk.dev

Brett Abramczyk · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
68match
gspeager.com
Garrett Speager
3 shared topicsprogramming-languages
65match
ahmetky.dev
Ahmet Kaya — Full Stack Developer
3 shared topicsprogramming-languages
65match
dnatanmai.com
Deepak N. - Full Stack Developer - Portfolio
3 shared topicsweb-development
65match
piotrwitek.com
Piotr Witek — Programming, Ruby & Software Engineering
3 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
roihansalsabila.com
Roihan Salsabila
3 shared topicsweb-development
64match
benpetrillo.dev
Ben Petrillo
3 shared topicsweb-development
64match
andygarrett.net
Andy Garrett
3 shared topicsweb-development
64match
andrewmcodes.dev
Andrew Mason // Senior Full Stack Ruby Developer
3 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
neuralphantom.com
Ali Tarakzai
3 shared topicsweb-development
64match
bilski.tech
On Software Engineering
3 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
anjishnudey.tech
Anjishnu Dey — Computer Science Engineer
3 shared topicsweb-development
64match
aayushksharma.com
Yush — Software Engineer
3 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
aaapwn.com
Puwit Nunpan — Full-Stack Developer
3 shared topicsweb-development
64match
bnlucas.com
Nathan Lucas — Staff Software Engineer
3 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
akshit.io
Akshit Kr Nagpal – Software Engineer
3 shared topicsweb-development
63match
akshitkrnagpal.com
Akshit Kr Nagpal – Software Engineer
3 shared topicsweb-development
63match
aaronmallen.me
Aaron Allen
3 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
cmgcode.com
Campbell Gorman — Software Engineer
3 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.