Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to aboutgilfoyle.com

The A.P. Gilfoyle Group · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
70match
thealcockgroup.com
The Alcock Group
2 shared topicsprivate-equity
68match
bullstonegroup.com
Bull Stone Group
2 shared topicsventure-capital
67match
ayregroup.co.uk 🇬🇧
Venture Capital | Ayre Group
2 shared topicsventure-capital
67match
siriscapital.com
Siris Capital Group
2 shared topicsprivate-equity
67match
siris.com
Siris Capital Group
2 shared topicsprivate-equity
67match
fulcrumvg.com
Fulcrum Venture Group
2 shared topicsventure-capital
66match
mudbrickgroup.com
Mudbrick Group
2 shared topicsprivate-equity
66match
palmstone-group.com
Palmstone Group®
2 shared topicsprivate-equity
66match
regiscap.com
Regis Capital Group — Investment Management
2 shared topicsprivate-equity
66match
astreoninvestment.com
Astreon Investment Group | Private Equity & Global Ventures
2 shared topicsventure-capital
66match
mulberryinvestments.com
Mulberry Investment Group - Home
2 shared topicsprivate-equity
65match
accelragroup.com
Accelra Group
2 shared topicsprivate-equity
65match
efencegroup.com
Eastern Fence Group | Hedge Fund Incubator
2 shared topicsventure-capital
65match
4dmtgroup.com
4DMT Group - Holdings Company Portfolio
2 shared topicsprivate-equity
65match
eddoncapital.com
Eddon Capital Management
2 shared topicsprivate-equity
65match
the-beck-group.com
Beck Group Home page, London
2 shared topicsventure-capital
65match
the52group.com
The 52 Group - Digital Infrastructure, Real Estate & Venture Capital
2 shared topicsprivate-equity
65match
theassetlight.com
Asset Light Ventures — Global Principal-Led CVC Group
2 shared topicsventure-capital

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.