Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to abosh.me

Andrew Abosh — Portfolio · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
73match
andrewmcguckin.com
Andrew McGuckin - Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
72match
andrewho.me
Andrew Ho
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
71match
piersrajguru.com
Piers Rajguru - Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
alanagreenaway.dev
Alana Greenaway - Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
nibardo.com
Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
fbence.com
Bence Farkas | Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
mattsibson.com
Matt Sibson - Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
arnav-sethi.com
Arnav Sethi | Portfolio
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
70match
kumarashish.com
Ashish Kumar | Portfolio
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
70match
abhixv.dev
Abhishek Sharma | Portfolio
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
70match
krisjulio.dev
Kris - Portfolio
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
70match
mclaindevelopment.com
Ross McLain | Portfolio v2
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
70match
pittenauer.com
Martin Pittenauer | Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
robkumar.com
Rob Kumar's Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
andrewpvogel.com
Andrew Vogel - Software Developer
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
70match
andrewvogel.dev
Andrew Vogel - Software Developer
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
69match
a2drew.com
Andrew Frazier
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
69match
rolzie.com
Rolzie - Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.