Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to aboring.dev

A Boring Dev · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
62match
bubbling-library.com
Bubbling Library
3 shared topicsweb-development
62match
eclecticdevlog.com
Eclectic Dev Log
3 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
musafi.dev
Salman Dev Space
3 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
asyncmove.com
Move into the Future
3 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
buhsl.com
Java Developer notes
3 shared topicsweb-development
62match
jshell.com
JShell | Dev Dashboard
3 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
jsonescape.com
JSON Escape Tool - Free Online JSON String Escaper
3 shared topicsweb-development
62match
justfuckinguseredux.com
Just Fucking Use Redux
3 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
craftmend.com
Mats | Developer journal
3 shared topicsweb-development
62match
andybarringer.com
Andy Barringer | Portfolio
3 shared topicsweb-development
62match
alextldr.com
Alex - Full Stack Developer
3 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
julyw.com
July Wu | Student Developer
3 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
lorandbiro.com
Loránd Biró's coding blog
3 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
munadil.com
Munadil - Software Developer
3 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
61match
by-ced.dev
Ced's Portfolio | Web Developer
3 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
61match
jwebbytes.com
JWebBytes // Programming Blog
3 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
61match
jvdelacruz.com
Jon Ver: Full Stack Developer
3 shared topicsweb-development
61match
ozkary.com
Ozkary - Emerging Technologies
3 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.