Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to abooksmind.com

A Book's Mind · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
71match
testabook.com
Test A Book
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
68match
businessdirectorycentral.com
eBooks's Site
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
68match
businessdirectoryexperts.com
eBooks's Site
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
68match
businessdirectoryhq.com
eBooks's Site
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
68match
businessdirectorypros.com
eBooks's Site
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
66match
ec1books.com
EC1 Books
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
66match
thebookcare.com
The Book Care
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
66match
accidental-interest-books.com
accidental interest books
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
65match
ebookmining.com
Ebook Mining
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
65match
atlantabookprinting.com
Atlanta Book Printing Home
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
65match
thebookleader.com
The Book Leader
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
65match
silverstreetmedia.com
Welcome to Silver Street Media – Silver Street Media Bookstore
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
65match
allusionbooks.org
Allusion Books
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
65match
mslsailor.com
Write a book. Make a difference.
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
65match
cosmicpublication.com
Cosmic Books Publishers Pvt.Ltd
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
65match
the-book-coach.com
The Book Coach - Home
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
64match
lucidbooks.com
Home | Lucid Books
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
64match
mubabookspress.com
Muba Books & Stationery Press
1 shared topicspublishing-industry

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.