Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to abookapart.com

A Book Apart · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
65match
packerbook.com
The Packer Book
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
paganbookworm.com
Pagan Bookworm
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
3hh.dev
3 Hour Hacks - Build the Future
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
terraformbook.com
The Terraform Book
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
2ndsky.org
Bookmarked
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
2tmorrow.com
2morrow — 2morrow
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
technologybook.co.uk 🇬🇧
Technology Book - Read About Latest Tech Trends
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
bughuntersclub.com
Bug Hunters Club | Bug Hunters Club
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
aeonaxy.org
Aeonaxy — CS Books & Developer Resources
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
acrocan.com
Bookmarks
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
ejaugust.com
EJ's Notebook
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
hookbug.com
HookBug — Never miss a webhook again
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
academyhightech.com
Academy High Tech — Technical books, version-controlled
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
juanriano.com
Juan Riano
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
lucabol.com
Luca Bolognese
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
relayextension.com
Relay - Cross-Browser Bookmark Sync
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
abobija.com
Alija Bobija
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
lookmeblog.com
Look me Blog
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.