Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to abilenegives.org

Abilene Gives 2026 · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
86match
1burkegives.org
1BurkeGives 2025
1 shared topicsnon-profit-organizations
75match
avenuesforhope.org
Avenues for Hope Housing Challenge
1 shared topicsnon-profit-organizations
68match
imggives.com
IMG GIVES
1 shared topicsnon-profit-organizations
67match
mandrgives.com
M&R Gives
1 shared topicsnon-profit-organizations
66match
bggives.com
Bluegrass Gives
1 shared topicsnon-profit-organizations
66match
dfwgive.com
Where Giving Thrives - Communities Foundation Of Texas
1 shared topicsnon-profit-organizations
65match
theairdrie100.com
HOME - 100 Airdrie Men Who Give A Damn
1 shared topicsnon-profit-organizations
65match
anidaso.org
Anidaso | Give Hope
1 shared topicsnon-profit-organizations
65match
avpct.org
Alternatives to Violence Project - CT
1 shared topicsnon-profit-organizations
64match
demoorganization.com
Givsum | Givsum Beta
1 shared topicsnon-profit-organizations
64match
igive2u.com
iGive2U
1 shared topicsnon-profit-organizations
64match
academyofgivers.org
Academy of Givers Malta
1 shared topicsnon-profit-organizations
64match
peelitforward.com
Peel It Forward – Peel it forward for your community
1 shared topicsnon-profit-organizations
64match
aaccpta.org
Givebacks
1 shared topicsnon-profit-organizations
64match
asapackerpta.org
Givebacks
1 shared topicsnon-profit-organizations
64match
100womenofwhatcom.com
| Simply Giving
1 shared topicsnon-profit-organizations
64match
chimacumpta.com
Givebacks
1 shared topicsnon-profit-organizations
64match
tgb-preprod.com
The Giving Block
1 shared topicsnon-profit-organizations

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.