Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to abi.io

abi@io:~$ ~/writing · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
65match
closedjdk.com
JDK
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
arkelziko.com
Arkel Ziko
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
nickgoede.com
Nick Goede's Thoughts
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
bluehood.dev
home | codekobold.io
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
rohinibarla.com
Rohini Kumar Barla
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
anicholson.net
build software, build people | andrewdotnich
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
interpreterbook.com
Writing An Interpreter In Go | Thorsten Ball
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
nextdoorhacker.com
NextDoorHacker
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
sofdevkit.com
SofDevKit - From Writing Code to Designing Professional Software
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
phpreads.com
PHP Reads - Curated PHP writing worth your time
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
introtoplaintext.com
Introduction | Introduction to Plaintext for Research and Writing
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
abdel.me
Home | Abdel
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
adarshravikumar.dev
Adarsh Ravikumar
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
robjdavey.com
RobJDavey
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
arkoisystems.com
$ cat ./arkoisystems
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
bengalluzzo.net
Ben Galluzzo | A little bit of everything that beeps and blinks
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
1saeed.dev
Saeed Salehi
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
kyleaclark.com
Kyle A. Clark
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.