Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to abeerkashar.dev

Abeer Kashar · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
66match
farazyashar.com
Faraz Yashar
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
abhaykashyap.com
Abhay Kashyap
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
63match
kusharma.com
Kush Sharma
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
63match
aakashkumar.net
Aakash Kumar
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
63match
alexpimenov.net
Sasha Pimenov
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
62match
aiengineerhq.org
AI Engineer HQ
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
62match
thetexashacker.com
thetexashacker
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
mathoholic.com
Shantanu Sharma
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
62match
aksharchavan.com
Akshar S. Chavan
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
62match
fe-engineer.com
FE-Engineer Youtube
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
nextgensolutionhub.com
NextGen Solution hub -
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
62match
aakash19here.com
Aakash Jadhav | Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
aakashkulkarni.dev
Aakash Kulkarni | Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
61match
aksmtr.com
Posts - Akash Mitra's Blog
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
61match
adhipk.dev
Adhip Kashyap - Client Solutions Architect & Full-Stack Developer
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
61match
aakash4dev.com
Aakash Singh Rajput | Senior Blockchain Engineer & AI Developer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
61match
arshakil.com
Shakil | AI Engineer & Builder
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
61match
neutrable.com
Neutrable | Share it. Check it.
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.